Cases 71 - 80 of 173
Boyce Moneyhan v. Alvin Keller
as 15-6417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOYCE S. MONEYHAN
Plaintiff:
DONALD NELSON, a/k/a William Donald Shopey
Defendant - Appellee:
ALVIN KELLER, ROBERT C. LEWIS, JENNIE LANCASTER and others
Defendant:
REGINALD MEWBORN, KENNETH JONES, REGINALD E. MIDGETTE and others
Goode v. Mitchell
as 1:2015de00022
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Goode
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Mitchell
as 5:2015hc02041
Petitioner:
Antoine Edward Davis
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
American Humanist Association et al v. Frank L. Perry et al
as 5:2015cv00070
Plaintiff:
American Humanist Association and Kwame Jamal Teague
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, David Guice, George Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
American Humanist Association et al v. Frank L. Perry et al
as 5:2015ct03053
Plaintiff:
American Humanist Association and Kwame Jamal Teague
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, David Guice, George Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shekau et al v. Obama et al
as 3:2014cv00049
Defendant:
March of Dimes, American Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Institute, National Domestic Violence Hotline and others
Plaintiff:
Abubakar Shekau doing business as Boko Haram and Son Truong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Francis v. Mitchell
as 5:2015hc02007
Petitioner:
Egbert Francis, Jr.
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
Lazurus Wright
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Ken Beaver, FNU Parker and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Bjerring et al
as 3:2014cv00724
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Bell
Defendant:
Gert Bjerring, David Mitchell, Nicola Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
MABE v. MITCHELL
as 1:2014cv01080
Petitioner:
MICHAEL W. MABE
Respondent:
R. DAVID MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
