Cases 71 - 80 of 280
Kelly et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03412
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Bernardo, Scott (I) Coddington, Karen Essendrop and others
Defendant:
Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Kidde PLC, Inc., National Foam Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The v. Traynum et al
as 8:2018cv01929
Defendant:
Tina Marie Murdock, Nancy Catherine Traynum and Christa Lane Murdock
Plaintiff:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Hicks v. Lane et al
as 1:2018cv01952
Defendant:
Mr. Derek Danley and Mr. G. Lane
Plaintiff:
Mr. Horace Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goss v. Stirling et al
as 2:2018cv02124
Defendant:
Charles Williams, Willie Davis, Richard Cothran and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell L Goss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ravenel et al v. Lane et al
as 9:2018cv02137
Defendant:
J Robertson, Charles Williams, NFN Marshal and others
Plaintiff:
Marquis Grampus, Vashaun Ravenel, Anthony C Shy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. New Gencoat Inc et al
as 3:2018cv01386
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lane
Defendant:
New Gencoat Inc , KPS Special Situation Funds LP, Gencoat Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garrett v. Stirling et al
as 0:2018cv01309
Plaintiff:
Robert Louis Garrett, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling, Bernard McKie, Franklin Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Benny et al
as 3:2018cv00808
Plaintiff:
Patsy Maria Lane
Defendant:
Susie Benny and S.C. Vocational Rehabitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lane et al v. Dorn Veterans Hospital et al
as 3:2018cv00807
Plaintiff:
Patsy Maria Lane
Defendant:
Dorn Veterans Hospital, VA Fiduciary Hub, Chiquetta Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2018cv00727
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lane Jackson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
