Cases 71 - 80 of 99
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hicks et al v. The Johns Hopkins University
as 1:2013cv03320
Plaintiff:
Michelle Hicks and Lillian Warren
Defendant:
The Johns Hopkins University
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
ESOTERIX GENETIC LABORATORIES, LLC et al v. LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, et al
as 1:2012cv01173
Plaintiff:
ESOTERIX GENETIC LABORATORIES, LLC and THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
Defendant:
LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS, LLC and ION TORRENT SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Neurografix et al v. The Johns Hopkins University et al
as 1:2012cv02181
Plaintiff:
Neurografix , Neurgraphy Institute Medical Associates, Inc. and Image-Based Surgicenter Corporation
Defendant:
The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
