Cases 81 - 90 of 169
James v. NC Department of Correction et al
as 5:2011ct03182
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lamount James
Defendant:
NC Department of Correction, Alvin Keller, Robert C. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas-El v. Branker et al
as 5:2011ct03178
Plaintiff:
Walic Christopher Thomas-El
Defendant:
G. J. Branker, North Carolina Department of Correction, Steve A. Balog and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. North Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2011ct03175
Plaintiff:
Larry K. Green
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Corrections, Carlton B. Joyner, Tresa Brown Tomlinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meeks v. North Carolina Department of Correction et al
as 5:2011ct03157
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Meeks
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Correction and Don Eddins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00676
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Eller v. Kaufman et al
as 3:2011cv00401
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Eller
Defendant:
Gary Kaufman , Keith Lovin , Keith Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Eller v. Kaufman et al
as 2:2011cv00031
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Eller
Defendant:
Gary Kaufman , Keith Lovin , Keith Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2011cv00636
Petitioner:
EARNEST J. SIMMONS
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NELSON v. NC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2011cv00626
Petitioner:
SCOTT OWEN NELSON
Respondent:
NC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. NC Department of Corrections
as 3:2011cv00385
Petitioner:
Scott Owen Nelson
Respondent:
NC Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
