Cases 81 - 90 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv03600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pepi Schafler v. HSBC Bank USA
as 10-1826
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEPI SCHAFLER
Defendant - Appellee:
HSBC BANK USA, Martin J. Glynn, CEO, SCOTT D. MILLER, PHILLIPS LYTLE and others
Hanover Insurance Company v. M&T Bank et al
as 1:2010cv00675
Plaintiff:
Hanover Insurance Company
Defendant:
M&T Bank and M&T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harper v. M&T Bank
as 8:2010cv00593
Plaintiff:
Sherman Harper
Defendant:
M&T Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
McLeod et al v. PB Investment Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv03218
Plaintiff:
Dennis McLeod, Betty McLeod and Andy S. Newman
Defendant:
PB Investment Corporation, PB Investment Corporation, PB Investment Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Pepi Schafler v. HSBC Bank USA
as 09-2298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEPI SCHAFLER
Defendant - Appellee:
HSBC BANK USA, Martin J. Glynn, CEO, SCOTT D. MILLER, PHILLIPS LYTLE and others
Lincoln Street Associates v. M&T Bank
as 3:2009cv02562
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Street Associates
Defendant:
M&T Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Bush v. President/CFO/CEO for M&T Bank et al
as 1:2009cv01845
Plaintiff:
Barbara M. Bush
Defendant:
President/CFO/CEO for M&T Bank and President/CFO/CEO for M&T Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
