Cases 81 - 90 of 94
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Administrative Subpoena
Perez v. MRB Incorporated et al
as 8:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
MRB Incorporated, Mary Beth Parker and MRB Incorporated SIMPLE IRA Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez v. Ocean View Seafood Restaurant Inc et al
as 3:2013cv03613
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Ocean View Seafood Restaurant Inc, Charalambos I Syrigos and Polizonis M Skeparnis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Island Landscapes LLC v. Garvey et al
as 2:2013cv03536
Plaintiff:
Island Landscapes LLC
Defendant:
Michelle B Garvey and Thomas E Perez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Perez v. Gaines Motor Lines, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv00170
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Gaines Motor Lines, Inc., Tim Gaines and Rick Tompkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. Hathaway et al
as 1:2013cv03253
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
William Kirsten Hathaway and Baltimore Behavioral Health 403(b) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Cusick v. Perez et al
as 8:2013cv02852
Plaintiff:
James P. Cusick, Jr.
Defendant:
Thomas E. Perez and Bruce Dory
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Perez v. Brown et al
as 4:2013cv00130
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Brian K. Brown, The Classic Group, Inc., 401 (K) Profit Sharing Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Perez v. American Marble Products Inc et al
as 4:2013cv02245
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
American Marble Products Inc, Daryl H Sorensen, Monica Sorensen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. MESSER et al
as 1:2013cv00655
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
MITCHELL W. MESSER, WESCO SIGNES, INC. RETIREMENT PLAN, WESCO SIGNS INC HEALTH PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
