Cases 1 - 10 of 62
US v. Mercedes Pineda-Duarte
as 24-4096
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MERCEDES PINEDA-DUARTE
Duarte v. Vitorino et al
as 8:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Luisa Duarte
Defendant:
Vincenzo Vitorino and Billy Douglas Hogue, Jr.
Cross Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Douglas Duart v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv06961
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Duart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Castor et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04825
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
RALPH CASTOR, JR., WAYNE DEROUIN, Brian DeVries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Duarte-Pineda v. USA
as 5:2023cv00240
Petitioner:
Ana Duarte-Pineda
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DUARTE v. USA
as 1:2023cv00100
Petitioner:
NESTOR IVAN DUARTE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
US v. Nestor Duarte
as 23-6057
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NESTOR IVAN DUARTE, a/k/a Josue Cruz Estrada
Cristy Ocampo-Duarte v. Merrick Garland
as 22-2109
Petitioner:
CRISTY OCAMPO-DUARTE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Adan Duarte v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1704
Petitioner:
ADAN FLORES DUARTE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Prudencio et al v. Triple R Construction Corporation et al
as 8:2022cv01202
Plaintiff:
Eric Prudencio, Anthony Prudencio, Moises Antonio Prudencio and others
Defendant:
Triple R Construction Corporation, Robert Leigh Rodriguez, Evelyn J. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
