Cases 1 - 10 of 1,750
Watson v. USA
as 4:2024cv03579
Petitioner:
Charles Samuel Watson, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Watson v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Darrell N. Watson
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Rick White, Captain Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. Shaw et al
as 1:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
Ta'Kuan Bingham and Ta
Defendant:
Jefferey William Shaw, Monique Watson Donner, Dana Anne Fantozzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01678
Petitioner:
James Watson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albero et al v. Worcester County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Albero and Kevin Arthur
Defendant:
Worcester County Board of Commissioners, Sergeant Timothy Mulligan, Naomi Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Warden et al
as 2:2024cv03364
Plaintiff:
Marvin M. Watson
Defendant:
Warden, Travis Guess and S. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Watson et al.
as 1:2024cv00991
Defendant:
Jamal L. Thomas, Ms. D. Watson, St. Brides Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Watson et al
as 1:2024cv00990
Plaintiff:
Jamal L. Thomas
Defendant:
Ms. D. Watson and St. Brides Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Budney v. Ronnie Huneycutt
as 24-6326
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUDNEY, f/k/a Matthew R. Budney
Defendant:
RONNIE LANE HUNEYCUTT, Superintendent Warden at Avery Mitchell Correctional, BRIAN WATSON, Special Affairs Captain at Avery Mitchell Correctional Institution, RANDY S. MULL, Disciplinary Hearing Officer for the North Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
