Cases 1 - 10 of 478
Kidd v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00792
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Millard Clay Kidd
Cause Of Action: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022
Orr v. Richland County et al
as 4:2024cv04522
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Clay Orr
Defendant:
Mr. Rodney, Richland County, Mr. J. Lipcomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Orr v. Crayman et al
as 4:2024cv04477
Defendant:
Ms. Lewis, Mr. Shafer, Dr. Jermaine D. Gordon and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Clay Orr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Orr v. Richland County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2024cv04435
Defendant:
Richland County Sheriff's Office and Richland County Sheriff Leon Lott
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Clay Orr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Orr v. Blecher et al
as 3:2024cv04385
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Clay Orr
Defendant:
Virginia F. Belcher and Jeanette W. McBride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Clay v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00697
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff:
Jane Marie Clay
Cause Of Action: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022
Orr v. Harvey
as 4:2024cv04252
Respondent:
Director Harvey
Petitioner:
Jeremy Clay Orr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colvin et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 2:2024cv04058
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Brothers, Roland Henry Berger, Aliciarae Boucher and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Speigner et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv04057
Plaintiff:
Terry Miller, John L Miceli, Chinua McGee and others
Defendant:
UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
