Cases 1 - 10 of 28,959
Johnson et al v. Bay Shore Development Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01762
Plaintiff:
Laurens Johnson and Carol Ann Paolo
Defendant:
Bay Shore Development Corporation, JOHN DOE (11-20) and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-8
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Rent Lease & Ejectment
Orr v. Walsh et al
as 5:2024ct03154
Plaintiff:
Eric Christopher Orr
Defendant:
Sergeant Walsh, Correctional Officer Sculley, Sergeant Emig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smalls v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv03525
Plaintiff:
Sherry Smalls
Defendant:
Ofc. John Doe and GEICO Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Casper v. USA
as 3:2024cv00566
Petitioner:
John M. Casper
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Carraway v. Fields et al
as 5:2024ct03153
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Carraway, II
Defendant:
Lt. R. Fields, Officer J. Lane, Sgt. McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Charles John de Melker v. Cunliffe de Melker
as 1:2024cv01737
Plaintiff:
Estate of Charles John de Melker
Defendant:
Evelyn Cunliffe de Melker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Baird v. Sharp et al
as 0:2024cv03549
Plaintiff:
Dewight Sheldon Baird
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Sharp, Sergeant T. Session and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Bohlman v. GE Renewables US, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv03536
Plaintiff:
Melissa D Bohlman
Defendant:
GE Renewables US, LLC, GE Vernova, General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
US v. John Williams, III
as 24-4314
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERT WILLIAMS, III
Laquita Oliver v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 24-188
Petitioner:
LAQUITA OLIVER, CHERELLE JACOB, ANDRE ROBINSON and others
Respondent:
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
