Cases 1 - 10 of 1,842
Gaillard v. Hill-Finklea Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv03496
Plaintiff:
Percy Devon Gaillard
Defendant:
Hill-Finklea Detention Center, Major Anthony Fyall, Cpt. Archie Beau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Brennan et al
as 3:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Brandon Walker
Defendant:
Maintenance Brennan, Lt. Dickinson and Major Hurlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughter v. Vaughn et al
as 2:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
James R. Vaughter
Defendant:
Lt. R. Vaughn, Sgt. Andrews, Ofc. Mobley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kenneth Newkirk v. Warden Artrip
as 24-6559
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
WARDEN ARTRIP, INVESTIGATOR HARRIS, ASSISTANT WARDEN BLEVINS and others
Williams v. Fletcher et al
as 7:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. Fletcher, Mr. Creech, Mr. Sheppard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Hunter Dixon
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, J. Artrip, Major Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Gullett et al
as 7:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Jullian Andrew Pres Huffman
Defendant:
Captain Gullett, Major Parks and Smantha Parson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fogel v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brian Fogel
Defendant:
Major T. Hall, Warden Jeffrey Artrip, Assistant Warden J.H. Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Parks
as 7:2024cv00346
Petitioner:
Julian Huffman and Jullian Huffman
Respondent:
Major Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
