Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Zubieta v. ABM Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Odilia Julieth Leguizamon Zubieta
Defendant:
ABM Industries, Inc., RVA Hernandez Contractors, Inc., ABM Industry Groups LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Ramirez et al v. KRG Services LLC et al
as 8:2023cv02214
Plaintiff:
Adelina Ramirez and Jose Guzman
Defendant:
KRG Services LLC, ABM Industries Incorporated and Daysi Parada Soto
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Greater New York Mutual Insurance Company v. ABM Industries, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Greater New York Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
ABM Industries, Inc. and NIBCO, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Joseph Antonio v. SSA Security, Inc.
as 13-1031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONIO, BULAN JULES-ANTONIO, MICHAEL CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK POTTS and TERRI ROOKARD
Defendant - Appellee:
SSA SECURITY, INC., d/b/a Security Services of America, SECURITY SERVICES OF AMERICA, LLC, ABM INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Defendant:
JEREMY DANIEL PARADY, PATRICK STEPHEN WALSH, MICHAEL MCINTOSH EVERHART and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00886
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00335
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
