Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Aerotek, Incorporated v. Kenneth Nosky
as 24-1372
Plaintiff:
AEROTEK, INCORPORATED and ALLEGIS GROUP, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
KENNETH D. NOSKY
Allegis Group, Inc. v. Christopher Bero
as 23-2023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLEGIS GROUP, INCORPORATED and ASTON CARTER, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER J. BERO
Defendant:
AEROTEK AFFILIATED SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
AEROTEK, INC. et al v. JOBOT, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
AEROTEK, INC. and ALLEGIS GROUP, INC
Defendant:
JOBOT, LLC and COREY DALTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Allegis Group, Inc. et al. v Nosky
as 8:2022cv01516
Plaintiff:
Allegis Group, Inc. and Aerotek Inc.
Defendant:
Kenneth D. Nosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Allegis Group, Inc. et al v. Bero
as 1:2022cv00686
Plaintiff:
ALLEGIS GROUP, INC. and ASTON CARTER, INC.
Defendant:
Christopher J. Bero
Counter Defendant:
Aerotek Affiliated Services, Inc. and Aerotek, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Allegis Group, Inc. v. Youtube, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02900
Plaintiff:
Allegis Group and Allegis Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Youtube LLC, John Does 1-7, YouTube, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la
Allegis Group, Inc. et al v. Markey, IV
as 1:2021cv01499
Defendant:
John T. Markey, IV
Plaintiff:
Allegis Global Solutions, Inc. and Allegis Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allegis Group Inc v. Quantum Market Research, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02509
Defendant:
Quantum Market Research, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Allegis Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
