Cases 1 - 10 of 5,965
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lin v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Yan Lin
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and Attorney General Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Kidanu v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv01056
Plaintiff:
Amanuel Muchie Kidanu
Defendant:
Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Attorney General US Merrick B. Garland and UR M. Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jose Del Cid Quiteros v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1550
Petitioner:
JOSE ABRAHAM DEL CID QUITEROS, a/k/a Jose Quinteros Del Cid
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Vaughn Gardner v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1553
Petitioner:
VAUGHN ANDRE GARDNER
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Kevin Garcia-Mendoza v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1554
Petitioner:
KEVIN ALEXANDER GARCIA-MENDOZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00651
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 3:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Caleb Williams
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State, Attorney General Of The United States, United States Attorney For The Eastern District of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Ong v. Greene et al
as 1:2024cv01717
Petitioner:
Lye Huat Ong
Respondent:
David Greene and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
