Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Grant v. Deputy Angel Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv03021
Plaintiff:
Herman Grant, Jr.
Defendant:
Deputy Angel Rodriguez, Deputy Richard Sholtz and John Doe Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv05947
Plaintiff:
Angel Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Daniel Rodriguez v. Warden Janson
as 23-6702
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANNY ANGEL RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Daniel Rodriguez
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN FCI EDGEFIELD
Rodriguez v. Janson FCI Edgefield
as 1:2023cv01893
Petitioner:
Daniel Angel Rodriguez and Daniel Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Janson FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Blythe et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv02231
Plaintiff:
Calvin Blythe, Jerry Auffet, Conrad Stutzman and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022hc02017
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Rodriguez v. Streeval
as 7:2020cv00589
Respondent:
Warden Jason Streeval
Petitioner:
Danny Angel Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez v. So. Dist. of Fla et al
as 7:2020cv00512
Defendant:
Damian Giroux, Cristina Maxwell, So. Dist. of Fla and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Angel Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
