Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Anwar Hassan v. Barzani
as 1:2022cv01288
Plaintiff:
Shnyar Anwar Hassan
Defendant:
Masrour Barzani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Farabee v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
Brian Damon Farabee
Defendant:
Nelson Smith, Angela N. Torres, Angela Harvell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sledge v. Castilon et al
as 1:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Pamela Sledge
Defendant:
Richard Castilon, Michael Scatchard, Michael Comer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Elhady et al v. Piehota et al
as 1:2016cv00375
Plaintiff:
Anas Elhady , Osama Hussein Ahmed , Ahmad Ibrahim Al Halabi and others
Defendant:
Christopher M. Piehota, Steven Mabeus, G. Clayton Grigg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Doe et al v. Piehota et al
as 1:2016cv00373
Plaintiff:
Baby Doe , Yaseen Kadura , Anas Elhady and others
Defendant:
Christopher M. Piehota, Robin C. Burke, Timothy J. Healy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Anwar v. Ayoubi
as 1:2015cv00507
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Anwar
Defendant:
Abdul Rahman Ayoubi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anwar v. Ayoubi
as 1:2013cv01123
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Anwar
Defendant:
Abdul Rahman Ayoubi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aziz v. Information Planning and Management Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01420
Plaintiff:
Anwar Aziz
Defendant:
Information Planning and Management Service, Inc. and E. James Dale
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
