Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Rochester v. U.S. Marshals et al
as 6:2022cv01421
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals, Beth Drake, Bryan Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rochester v. Williams et al
as 6:2021cv03413
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
C ` Williams, B Stirling, H D McMaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Dehart et al
as 6:2021cv01060
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
Beth Drake, Rhett Dehart and Timothy M Cain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Invacare Corporation et al
as 6:2020cv04261
Defendant:
B Stirling, Tamaulipas Reymosa, Alan M Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Clerk et al
as 6:2020cv04249
Defendant:
Oconee County Magistrate Judges, Beth Drake, United States Marshal's Service and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Trump et al
as 6:2020cv01360
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Beth Drake, Donald J Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Williams et al
as 6:2020cv01309
Defendant:
B Stirling, A M Wilson, Beth Drake and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv02697
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
ROCHESTER v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv00792
Plaintiff:
JULIAN E. ROCHESTER
Defendant:
BETH DRAKE, BRYAN STIRLING, U.S.D. CT. SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Davis et al
as 6:2019cv00140
Defendant:
B Stirling, S Louis, Beth Drake and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
