Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bowman v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Anna-Elise Bowman
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokes v. Boyd et al
as 7:2023cv00762
Plaintiff:
Monte Stokes
Defendant:
C.O. Boyd, Sgt. Bowman and Lt. Blankenship
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. River North Prison
as 7:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
David Lee Bowman
Defendant:
River North Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Keen Mountain
as 7:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
David Lee Bowman
Defendant:
Keen Mountain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Bradburn et al
as 7:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Banks
Defendant:
CO Bradburn, CO Smallwood, CO Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Moore v. Squire et al
as 7:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Keyanta Lamont Moore
Defendant:
Sgt. C. Squire, Sgt. N. Bowman, R. Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00172
Petitioner:
Richard Rubin Bowman
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Henrico City General District et al v. Maxey et al
as 3:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Henrico City General District, CFDA, Richard J. Knapp and others
Defendant:
Millinya Monet Maxey, United States of America and Milinya Monet Maxey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Civil Rights
Walton Global Investments, Ltd. et al v. Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd.
as 3:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Walton Global Investments, Ltd. and Walton Virginia, LLC
Defendant:
Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
