Cases 1 - 10 of 10
STEPHENS v. LEAKE
as 1:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
GEORGE C. STEPHENS and GEORGE CHRISTOPHER STEPHENS
Defendant:
OFFICER DAWN LEAKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOMAX et al v. KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00923
Plaintiff:
JONNIE LOMAX and HAROLD LOMAX
Defendant:
KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC., TIM E BENTSEN, CHARLES A BLIXT and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
GRAHAM v. BENTSEN, et al
as 1:2016cv00612
Plaintiff:
JAMES GRAHAM
Defendant:
TIM E. BENTSEN , CHARLES A BLIXT , LYNN CRUMP-CAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
STEPHENS v. PRUIT
as 1:2014cv01021
Plaintiff:
DON C. STEPHENS
Defendant:
JONATHAN PRUIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Stephens et al
as 6:2014cv02541
Plaintiff:
Michael F Myers
Defendant:
David C Stephens, William N Nettles, Eric Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Tomie Isrel et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02379
Plaintiff:
Tomie Isrel , Jeanette Dodson , Gwendolyn Donnelly and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stephens et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv10681
Plaintiff:
Geneva C. Stephens and Onner J. Stephens
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephens v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv11880
Plaintiff:
Jessie C. Stephens
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stephens v. Stanley et al
as 4:2009cv00990
Plaintiff:
Autrey C Stephens and Autrey C Stephens
Defendant:
Stephen M Stanley, Stephen M Stanley, KAM Trucking and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Stephens et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00292
Plaintiff:
Eddie D. Stephens and Sheila C. Stephens
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
