Cases 1 - 10 of 23
KING v. DICKERSON et al
as 1:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Defendant:
MR. DICKERSON and MR. PHILLIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03307
Plaintiff:
Billy James Lewis, Patrick Joseph Jessee, Fidel Jimenez, Jr and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
White v. King et al
as 7:2023cv01049
Defendant:
THE HARPER CORPORATION - GENERAL CONTRACTORS, CHARLES B KING and HARPER BUILDERS
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE M WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Taylor v. King et al
as 7:2023cv01047
Defendant:
THE HARPER CORPORATION - GENERAL CONTRACTORS, CHARLES B KING and HARPER BUILDERS
Plaintiff:
MARJORIE L TAYLOR
3Rd Party Defendant:
Stephanie M White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
KING v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON, LIETENANT MCCLURE, N. TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Charles King, Jr.
as 17-7585
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES JERMAINE KING, JR., a/k/a Zig-Lah, a/k/a Ziggy, a/k/a Charles Jermaine King, Jr.
King v. Andrews
as 5:2017hc02181
Petitioner:
Charles Jermaine King
Respondent:
Justin Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
US v. Charles King
as 16-7057
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES JERMAINE KING, JR., a/k/a Zig-Lah, a/k/a Ziggy, a/k/a Charles Jermaine King, Jr.
King v. Warden
as 1:2016cv02574
Plaintiff:
Charles William King, 3rd
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles King, III v. Todd Strohman
as 16-6258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES WILLIAM KING, III
Defendant - Appellee:
DETECTIVE TODD STROHMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
