Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Whitfield v. Artis et al
as 2:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
David M. Whitfield
Defendant:
Sgt Artis, Ches. Jail Medical Staff, Sgt Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hazell v. Edmonds
as 3:2022cv00077
Petitioner:
Che Ernest Hazell
Respondent:
Larry Edmonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kim et al v. Agape Health Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00756
Defendant:
James Victory, Tae Kwon Ohm, Sun Ok Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Kyung Sim Che, Heesang Kim and Myeong Suk Choi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Che et al v. Agape Health Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00408
Plaintiff:
Myeong Suk Choi and Kyong Sim Che
Defendant:
Jeong Bok Lee and Agape Health Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Son et al v. Agape Health Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01047
Plaintiff:
Kyong Sim Che, Jae Min Lee, Hye Young Son and others
Defendant:
Sun Ok Lee, Agape Health Management, Inc. and Dong Chul Choi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Williams v. Johnson & Cartwright et al
as 2:2019cv00355
Defendant:
Cartwright, Johnson & Cartwright and Ches. Sheriff Dept
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ba v. Ridenhour et al
as 1:2015cv01669
Plaintiff:
Arnaud Ba
Defendant:
Zachary Ridenhour, Chris and Ches
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hung v. Laphen et al
as 1:2011cv01144
Plaintiff:
Che Wu Hung
Defendant:
Michael W. Laphen , Michael J. Mancuso , David J. Barram and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
The Estate of Michael Heiser et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 1:2009mc00048
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Michael Heiser, Gary Heiser, Francis Heiser and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
The Estate of Millard D. Campbell, Marie R. Campbell, Bessie A. Campbell and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran, The Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, The Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
