Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Woods v. Weber
as 1:2023cv00900
Petitioner:
Robert D. Woods
Respondent:
Ronald S. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Precision Franchising LLC v. M.D. Woods II, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00318
Plaintiff:
Precision Franchising LLC
Defendant:
Martin D Woods, Jr. and M.D. Woods II, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
First Indemnity of America Insurance Company v. Woods et al
as 8:2018cv03274
Defendant:
Joe K Woods, Mildred M Woods, Joe D Woods and others
Plaintiff:
First Indemnity of America Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kent v. Quality Care Properties, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01935
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Quality Care Properties, Inc., Mark S. Ordan, Glenn G. Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Nixon v. Sawyer et al
as 1:2017cv00845
Plaintiff:
Elmer Lee Nixon
Defendant:
J. Sawyer, W. James and Correctional D. Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nixon v. Chesapeake Correctional et al
as 1:2017cv00846
Plaintiff:
Elmer Nixon
Defendant:
Chesapeake Correctional, Lt. J. Sawyer, W. James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Bank of America Group Benefits Program et al
as 3:2016cv00784
Plaintiff:
Tony D. Woods
Defendant:
Bank of America Group Benefits Program and Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Woods v. Graham et al
as 1:2015cv02725
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Woods
Defendant:
Richard Graham, Jr. and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Woods v. Margolis, Pritzker, Epstein and Blatt, PA PC
as 1:2015cv00922
Plaintiff:
Roderick D. Woods
Defendant:
Margolis, Pritzker, Epstein and Blatt, PA PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
