Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Aparicio v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2023hc02020
Petitioner:
Antonio H. Aparicio
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security and DHS ICE DRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ynoa v. DHS ICE DRO
as 5:2022hc02209
Petitioner:
Ygnacio Ynoa
Respondent:
DHS ICE DRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Agedah v. Superintendent, Caroline Detention Facility et al
as 1:2021cv00405
Respondent:
Superintendent, Caroline Detention Facility
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security ("DHS/ICE")
Petitioner:
Theophilus Tari Agedah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Agedah v. Caroline Detention Facility ("CDF") et al
as 1:2021cv00342
Plaintiff:
Theophilus Tari Agedah
Defendant:
Caroline Detention Facility ("CDF") and Department of Homeland Security ("DHS/ICE")
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gutierrez-Peralta v. Superintendent et al
as 3:2021cv00036
Plaintiff:
Jason K. Gutierrez-Peralta
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security (DHS ICE) and Superintendent of Caroline Detention Facility (CDF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01265
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
SCOTT v. WOLFE et al
as 1:2018cv00239
Plaintiff:
DAVID PRESTON SCOTT
Defendant:
CASEY WOLFE, MARK CARVER and DHS, ICE OFFICERS OF U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JIMENEZ v. DHS, ICE CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
as 1:2017cv00948
Petitioner:
ELISEO CONTRERAS JIMENEZ
Respondent:
DHS, ICE CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03472
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ndongo v. DHS/ICE et al
as 3:2009cv00070
Plaintiff:
Germain Ndongo
Defendant:
DHS/ICE and Piedmont Detention Center
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
