Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Link et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02774
Plaintiff:
John Link, Jr., Keith Acton, Dennis Ahrens and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00491
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Doane v. Clarke et al
as 7:2020cv00250
Defendant:
Mr. Harold Clarke, J. Yonce, Sgt. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
DeAnthony Doane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doane v. Clarke et al
as 1:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, J. Yonce, Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
DeAnthony Doane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan Sellers v. Keller Unlimited LLC
as 19-2400
Defendant / Appellant:
KELLER UNLIMITED LLC, d/b/a Two Keys Tavern, MARK KELLER, Individually and 57 LIMITED LLC, d/b/a Two Keys Public House
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HEATHER STEELE, RYAN C. SELLERS, On Behalf of Herself and Others Similarly Situated, ALEXIS FORD-DOAN and others
Doan v. Gomez
as 5:2019hc02306
Respondent:
Christopher Gomez
Petitioner:
Curtiss M. Doan, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCormick et al v. Kershaw County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2019cv02578
Defendant:
Responding Unit 202, 911 Operator Brenda Johnson, Lee Doan and others
Plaintiff:
D'Mario K. Anderson and Lamitthia McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doan v. Gomez
as 5:2019cv00028
Respondent:
Christopher Gomez
Petitioner:
Curtiss M. Doan, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
