Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cauz v. LeFever
as 1:2023cv00126
Petitioner:
Javier Capote Cauz
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement and M. M. LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Serrano v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00110
Petitioner:
Carlos Serrano
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02829
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00895
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03212
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Remi Njoku v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 08-1688
Petitioner:
REMI CHIDE NJOKU
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Margarita Arcega v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-1422
Petitioner:
MARGARITA MARCELLANA ARCEGA
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, GREGORY L. COLLETT, District Director, Office fo Detention and Removal Operations, Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Margarita Arcega v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-1204
Petitioner:
MARGARITA MARCELLANA ARCEGA
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, GREGORY L. COLLETT, District Director, Office fo Detention and Removal Operations, Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
