Cases 1 - 10 of 412
Londell Alston v. City of Rock Hill
as 24-6594
Plaintiff:
LONDELL LASHUN ALSTON
Defendant:
CITY OF ROCK HILL, COUNTY OF YORK, ROCK HIL POLICE DEPARTMENT JOHN DOE #1 and others
Tamaris (Gibraltar) Limited v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2024cv01026
Plaintiff:
TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Onaje Seabrook v. LT. Carter
as 24-6561
Plaintiff:
ONAJE KUDURA SEABROOK
Defendant:
LT. CARTER, SGT. MILES PERKINS, JANE DOE #3, Health Care Authority and others
Wilson v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2024cv01660
Plaintiff:
Demiqou Wilson
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. Strom Law Firm et al
as 3:2024cv03363
Plaintiff:
Samuel T. Wiggins
Defendant:
Strom Law Firm, Pete Strom, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Onaje Seabrook v. LT. Carter
as 24-6461
Plaintiff:
ONAJE KUDURA SEABROOK
Defendant:
LT. CARTER, SGT. MILES PERKINS, JANE DOE #3, Health Care Authority and others
Kenneth Creel v. Gary Junker
as 24-6449
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RAY CREEL
Defendant:
GARY JUNKER, DR. ARTHUR CAMPBELL, DEBRA FITZGERALD and others
Ibach v. Charleston County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2024cv02573
Plaintiff:
Trevor Ibach
Defendant:
Charleston County Sheriffs Office, Kristen Graziano, Nicholas Vecchione and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Rosch et al
as 7:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Keith Almarode, Melissa Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Officer John Doe 1 et al
as 4:2024cv01751
Plaintiff:
Lauren Moe Morris
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 1, Officer John Doe 2, Officer John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
