Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Dorriety v. Sonoco Products Company
as 4:2023cv05986
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dorriety
Defendant:
Sonoco Products Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DHD Jessamine LLC v. Florence County South Carolina et al
as 4:2022cv01235
Plaintiff:
DHD Jessamine LLC
Defendant:
Florence County South Carolina, Frank J Brand, Jason Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
McCall v. Bodiford et al
as 2:2015cv01011
Plaintiff:
Terry Edward McCall
Defendant:
Scotty R Bodiford, James Dorriety, Practitioner Rae P and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. Bodiford et al
as 2:2015cv01012
Plaintiff:
Terry Edward McCall
Defendant:
Scotty Bodiford, James Dorriety and D Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Dorriety
as 6:2013cv02252
Petitioner:
Clayton Thomas Jones
Respondent:
James Dorriety
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Greenville County Police Department et al
as 6:2013cv02169
Plaintiff:
Clayton Thomas Jones
Defendant:
Greenville County Police Department, Lucas Marchant, Greenville County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Watkins v. Cartlege et al
as 3:2013cv01129
Petitioner:
Robert Max Watkins
Respondent:
Leroy Cartlege, James M Dorriety, W Walter Wilkins, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00246
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Eugene Thomas v. James Dorriety
as 12-7977
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. DORRIETY, SCOTTY BODIFORD, TRACY H. KRIEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
