Cases 1 - 10 of 19
M.L. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
M.L., E.W. and S.W.
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Colette Peters, Christopher Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Prevette v. Gaither et al
as 5:2022ct03025
Plaintiff:
Brandon Matthew Prevette
Defendant:
Dr. L. Gaither and Sergeant Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blakney v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021ct03222
Plaintiff:
Larry Blakney
Defendant:
United States of America, Dr. L. Graddy and Dr. Dubois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7238
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. PERRIGAN, J. ELY, Unit Manager, J. GILLIAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. G. Kellett
as 20-6649
Defendant / Appellee:
D. GOODE, G. MILITANA, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DR. L. WANG, Physician, LESLIE S. GREEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-6638
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. PERRIGAN, J. ELY, Unit Manager, J. GILLIAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 19-7842
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. PERRIGAN, J. ELY, Unit Manager, B. RAVIZEE MONAHAN, QMHP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Meyers v. Manis et al
as 7:2019cv00406
Defendant:
Ulm Collins, Hawkins, Walter Swiney and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory v. Hurwitz et al
as 1:2018cv03605
Defendant:
Dr. I. Negron, Hugh Hurwitz, Dr. R. Lepiane and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Gregory, Jr. v. L. Levin
as 17-7455
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM JAMES GREGORY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. L. LEVIN, Dr. Doctor Haynesville Corr. Ctr.
Defendant:
CHARLES ALLEN, Warden, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, DAVID ROBINSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
