Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Truman v. Shrader et al
as 7:2022cv00570
Plaintiff:
Cecil Guy Truman
Defendant:
Lt. M. Shrader, Sgt. C. Russo, Dr. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conley v. Mullins et al
as 7:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Phillip Conley
Defendant:
Dr. Mullins and Dr. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kalvin Coward v. Harold Clarke
as 22-6521
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KALVIN DONNELL COWARD, a/k/a Kelvin D. Coward
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations, J. A. WOODSON, Warden - Augusta Correctional Center and others
Hall v. Smith
as 7:2021cv00044
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ray Hall
Defendant:
Dr. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coward v. Clarke et al
as 7:2020cv00702
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Donnell Coward and Kelvin D. Coward
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, D. Dameron, S. Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7262
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DANIELS, J. ELY, A. W. COMBS and others
Defendant:
JAMES JONES, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7246
Defendant / Appellee:
I. O. RIVERO, I. O. HARRIS, J. ELY and others
Defendant:
JULIA C. DUDLEY, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Wayne Hailey v. B. Mullins
as 20-7193
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. SMITH, Doctor and B. MULLINS, Doctor
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE EDWARD HAILEY
Lamon v. Smith et al
as 6:2020cv02534
Plaintiff:
Andre Lamon
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner Gaines and Dr Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Hazelrigg et al
as 5:2020ct03169
Defendant:
Nurse William, Jim O'Neill, Advocacy Worker and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
