Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Killings et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00398
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Lemuel Killings, Jr, James Harper, Raymond Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
US v. Ben Johnson
as 23-4690
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BEN EARL-JUNIOR JOHNSON, a/k/a Ben Earl Johnson, Jr., a/k/a Ben Earl Johnson, Sr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00396
Defendant:
3M Company, Dupont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bruce Mason, CArlos Alberto Garcia, Theodore Michael Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Johnson v. USA
as 7:2020cv00038
Petitioner:
Daniel Earl Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. City of Goose Creek et al
as 2:2018cv00143
Plaintiff:
Earl Johnson
Defendant:
City of Goose Creek and Department of Social Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1982
South Carolina, State of v. Johnson
as 2:2017cv03218
Plaintiff:
South Carolina, State of
Defendant:
Earl Johnson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
South Carolina, State of v. Johnson
as 2:2017cv02730
Plaintiff:
South Carolina, State of
Defendant:
Earl Johnson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Melchizedek et al
as 8:2017cv02050
Plaintiff:
Earl Johnson, Jr
Defendant:
Tod Melchizedek, Christopher Kiviyatu and Steven Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Daniel Johnson
as 15-4364
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL EARL JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
