Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Joseph Edward Harris v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv05677
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brown v. Five Points Services Inc et al
as 3:2021cv04071
Plaintiff:
Natalie Renee Brown
Defendant:
Five Points Services Inc and Neal Edwards Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. USA - 2255
as 8:2016cv01717
Petitioner:
Donnell Edward Harris
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Harris v. Wake County Medical Administration
as 5:2015ct03203
Plaintiff:
James Edward Harris
Defendant:
Wake County Medical Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Wake County Court of Justice et al
as 5:2015ct03154
Plaintiff:
James Edward Harris
Defendant:
Wake County Court of Justice, Wake County Administration and City of Raleigh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kariotakis v. Tire Centers LLC et al
as 6:2013cv03485
Plaintiff:
Linda Kariotakis
Defendant:
Tire Centers LLC, Michelin North America Inc and Edward Harris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Harris et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2013cv07836
Plaintiff:
Barbara Ann Harris and Ronald Edward Harris
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC, Coloplast A/S, Coloplast Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harris v. City of Goldsboro, North Carolina
as 5:2011mc00025
Plaintiff:
James Edward Harris
Defendant:
City of Goldsboro, North Carolina
Harris v. City of Raleigh, NC et al
as 5:2010mc00056
Plaintiff:
James Edward Harris
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, NC, Phoenix Elizabeth and Catrice Wilson
Harris v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2010ct03098
Plaintiff:
James Edward Harris
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, J. Bishop, R.A. Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
