Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Johnathan Fuller v. Erik Hooks
as 24-7076
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN A. FULLER
Defendant:
MICHAEL NORRIS, BETTY BROWN, KENNETH LASSITER and others
MIAL BEY v. HOOKS
as 1:2024cv00670
Petitioner:
YUSUFI BURTON MIAL BEY
Respondent:
ERIK HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MIAL BEY v. HOOKS
as 1:2024cv00524
Petitioner:
YUSUFI BURTON MIAL BEY
Respondent:
ERIK HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CORBETT v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
STANLEY EARL CORBETT, JR.
Defendant:
ERIK HOOKS, CHRISTOPHER RICH, KATY POOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cooper et al
as 5:2023ct03322
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
Governor Roy Cooper, Todd E. Ishee, Stephen Waddell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. LEE et al
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMA ANDERSON and ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
LEE, SALISBURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, HONEYCUTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Chisel-Wilson et al
as 5:2022ct03380
Plaintiff:
Robert Dwayne Lewis
Defendant:
Tara Chisel-Wilson, Curtis Ward, Christina Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 3:2022cv00138
Petitioner:
David Meyers
Respondent:
Todd Ishee, Denise Jackson, Prescott Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. North Carolina et al
as 5:2022ct03046
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
North Carolina, Governor Roy Cooper, Erik Hooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. Honeycutt et al
as 1:2021cv00348
Plaintiff:
Johnathan A. Fuller
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, James Waldroop, Landon Browning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
