Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Morton v. Vargas Cisneros et al
as 1:2023cv01726
Plaintiff:
Amada Maite Morton
Defendant:
Reymundo Artime Vargas Cisneros and Ellis A Fonseca
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv02179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fifer et al v. Limon Properties, et al
as 7:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Robert Fifer and Teresa Fifer
Defendant:
Limon Properties - Fonseca Rentals, Limon Properties, Fonseca Rentals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Kevin Fonseca v. I.B.T Teamsters Local Union 71
as 22-1534
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN FONSECA and KEVIN PETER FONSECA
Defendant / Appellee:
I.B.T TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 71 and ERNEST WRENN
Kevin Fonseca v. American Red Cross
as 22-1520
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN FONSECA and KEVIN PETER FONSECA
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN RED CROSS, GAIL MCGOVERN, ANGELA POWLEY and others
Fonseca v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 6:2021cv04002
Plaintiff:
Ninotschka Fonseca
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Fonseca v. American Red Cross et al
as 3:2021cv00452
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fonseca
Defendant:
American Red Cross, Gail McGovern, Angela Powley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fonseca v. Teamsters Local Union No. 71 et al
as 3:2021cv00450
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fonseca
Defendant:
Teamsters Local Union No. 71 and Ernest Wrenn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
Fonseca v. American Red Cross et al
as 3:2021cv00368
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fonseca
Defendant:
American Red Cross, Gail McGovern, Angela Powley and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
