Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Steed v. Lynch et al
as 5:2024ct03105
Plaintiff:
Byron Steed
Defendant:
Sgt. Lynch, Sgt. Bunn, Sgt. Hobgood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobgood v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hobgood
Defendant:
Unknown, Sargeant Walass, Miss Moodey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobgood v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00576
Plaintiff:
Keon Hobgood
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Hobgood v. Dave's et al
as 3:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hobgood
Defendant:
Mis Dave's and Mr Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobgood v. Jarit et al
as 3:2023cv00554
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Hobgood, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. Jarit, Ms. Barnes, Mr. Bhat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobgood v. Wilshire et al
as 3:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Hobgood, Jr.
Defendant:
Miss Wilshire, Mr. Faulk and Mr. Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEBANE v. CLARK et al
as 1:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MEBANE, LARRY JUNIOR MERIS and RAYMOND SCHOFIELD HYATT
Defendant:
SERGEANT CLARK, CAPTAIN JOHNSON, CAPTAIN SELLERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Hobgood v. Timothy Brooks
as 21-1641
Defendant / Appellee:
DENIS DEAN, GERALD FAULKNER and TIMOTHY LLOYD BROOKS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DANIEL HOBGOOD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
