Cases 1 - 10 of 1,184
Kirby v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2024cv01629
Respondent:
Virginia Commonwealth of
Petitioner:
Leonard Kirby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirby v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2024cv00571
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Petitioner:
Leonard Kirby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tucker v. Diggs
as 5:2024hc02159
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Diggs
Petitioner:
Darryl Leonard Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirby v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2024cv00540
Petitioner:
Leonard Kirby
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walsh et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv04680
Plaintiff:
William Watts, Barry Watson, Joseph Walters and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Kirby v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2024cv00558
Petitioner:
Leonard Kirby
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00586
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04235
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Moore v. Scott et al
as 1:2024cv02210
Defendant:
Mayor Brandon Scott, Peace Officer F. Willcox and Robert Leonard, Esq.
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02206
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
