Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Beshenich Muir & Associates, LLC v. Bravura Information Technology Systems, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01417
Defendant:
Bravura Information Technology Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Beshenich Muir & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Donald Muir, Sr. v. Saed Qatawneh
as 23-1969
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD MUIR, SR.
Defendant / Appellant:
SAED QATAWNEH and AMIR MASHAQBEH, d/b/a Jordan Towing, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
METRO AUTO SALES, INC.
Muir v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00737
Plaintiff:
Steven Muir
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Muir v. Qatawneh et al
as 1:2021cv01794
Plaintiff:
Donald Muir, Sr.
Defendant:
Saed Qatawneh, Amir Mashaqbeh doing business as Jordan Towing, Inc. and Metro Auto Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Pevia v Commissioner of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv01656
Plaintiff:
Donald R Pevia
Defendant:
Commissioner of Corrections, Warden, Frank Bishop, C.O. II Muir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Thornton v. CO E. Muir
as 1:2021cv01587
Defendant:
CO E. Muir
Plaintiff:
Raekwon Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ndokey Enow v. Ricky Foxwell
as 19-6351
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL KNIGHT, CMS II, STEPHEN ELLIOTT, Lieutenant, MIKE MUIR, Case Management Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NDOKEY ENOW
Reil v. Muir et al
as 1:2018cv02233
Defendant:
John Codd, Michael Muir and Cathy Grant
Plaintiff:
Avery Reil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Carter v. MHM Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00156
Plaintiff:
Raymond Carter
Defendant:
MHM Services, Inc., Deidre Mull, Dr. Siracusano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
