Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Feds for Medical Freedom v. Antony Blinken
as 24-1079
Plaintiff:
FEDS FOR MEDICAL FREEDOM, MARIE BALLERINI-HOUGNON, DONALD CARROLL and others
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of State, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, CAROL PEREZ, in her official capacity as Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Global Talent Bureau in the Bureau of Global Talent Management at the the U.S. Department of State and others
Feds for Medical Freedom v. Blinken et al
as 1:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Feds for Medical Freedom, Marie Ballerini-Hougnon, Donald Carroll and others
Defendant:
Anthony J. Blinken, Department of State, Carol Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gail Hutto v. SC Retirement System
as 13-1523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GAIL M. HUTTO, ELIZABETH W. HODGE, MARGARET B. LINEBERGER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THE SOUTH CAROLINA RETIREMENT SYSTEM, THE POLICE OFFICERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM, THE SOUTH CAROLINA RETIREMENT SYSTEMS GROUP TRUST and others
Morrison et al v. Hofheimer
as 2:2011cv00137
Plaintiff:
S. Neil Morrison , The Melvin R. Morrison, DDS 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan and Melvin R. Morrision, DDS, Ltd.
Defendant:
Marcia S. Hofheimer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Padilla v. Adams
as 7:2011cv00008
Plaintiff:
Melvin Rodriguez Padilla
Defendant:
Marcia S Adams and South Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hofheimer v. Morrison
as 2:2010cv00637
Plaintiff:
Marcia S. Hofheimer
Defendant:
Warren B. Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hofheimer v. Morrison et al
as 2:2010cv00424
Plaintiff:
Marcia S. Hofheimer
Defendant:
S. Neil Morrison and Melvin R. Morrison, DDS, Ltd
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1381
Summers et al v. Adams et al
as 3:2008cv02265
Plaintiff:
Thomas A Summers, Robert M Knight, Sanford T Marcus and others
Defendant:
Marcia S Adams and Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
