Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Dean v. Ray et al
as 5:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Todd G. Dean
Defendant:
Mrs. Ray and Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCargo v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00139
Petitioner:
Kareem McCargo
Respondent:
Warden Mrs. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dean v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Todd G. Dean
Defendant:
Mrs. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Ray et al
as 5:2023ct03066
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Mr. Ray, David Randall Newman, R. Gonzolaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00046
Petitioner:
Tammy Jean Holmes
Respondent:
Mrs. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hanna v. FCI Hazelton Warden Mrs. Ray
as 5:2023cv00012
Petitioner:
Kevin W. Hanna
Respondent:
FCI Hazelton Warden Mrs. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hanna v. FCI Hazelton Warden Mrs. Ray
as 5:2023cv00003
Petitioner:
Kevin W. Hanna
Respondent:
FCI Hazelton Warden Mrs. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Norris v. Joyner et al
as 1:2019cv00245
Defendant:
Director Brian Sterlin, Major Mr. Ray, Warden Mr. Joyner and others
Plaintiff:
Garron LaDon Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowry v. Jones et al
as 8:2018cv02017
Defendant:
Mrs Mack, Mrs Ray and T Jones
Plaintiff:
Jason Edward Lowry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teresa Miller v. WVDOC
as 17-6463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERESA MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, a/k/a WVDOC, COMMISSIONER JIM RUBENSTEIN, WARDEN LAURA LORI NOHE and others
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, MR. MEED, MR. MEEK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
