Cases 1 - 10 of 40
McLernon v. Scott et al
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Mary Ellen McLernon
Defendant:
Blake Scott, eHealhInsurance Services, Inc. and Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Antos v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co. et al
as 2:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Janice Antos
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Co. and Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BRYANT v. Mutual Of Omaha Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRYANT
Defendant:
Mutual Of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bryant v. Mutual Of Omaha Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv01397
Plaintiff:
John Bryant
Defendant:
Mutual Of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jones v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00905
Plaintiff:
Keyonna Jones
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Childers v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co. et al
as 1:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Bill S. Childers
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Co. and Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bryant v. Mutual Of Omaha Insurance Company
as 2:2021cv00674
Plaintiff:
John Bryant
Defendant:
Mutual Of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Bishop v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 5:2021cv03671
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Bishop
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chester Yates v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.
as 20-1853
Defendant / Appellee:
MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHESTER A. YATES
Yates v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 3:2020cv00189
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Chester A. Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.