Cases 1 - 10 of 12
US v. Rushaun Parker
as 21-6461
Defendant / Appellant:
RUSHAUN NECKO PARKER, a/k/a Duke, a/k/a Rushuan Nekoe Parker, a/k/a Rushuan Nikoe Parker
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Rushaun Parker
as 20-6220
Defendant / Appellant:
RUSHAUN NECKO PARKER, a/k/a Duke, a/k/a Rushuan Nekoe Parker, a/k/a Rushuan Nikoe Parker
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sentinel Insurance Company, LTD. v. Papaloizou et al
as 1:2019cv01398
Plaintiff:
Sentinel Insurance Company, LTD.
Defendant:
Taverna, Inc. and Niko Papaloizou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coakley v. South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice et al
as 5:2019cv02159
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice, Bobby McCutcheon, Niko Samples and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Coakley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Wilson v. South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice et al
as 5:2019cv00836
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice, Bobby McCutcheon, Niko Samples and others
Plaintiff:
Lindel Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2019cv00644
Petitioner:
Niko Thompson
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Old Republic Surety Company v. Ionion Painting Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00634
Defendant:
Nikos Dimas, Ionion Painting Inc., Suburban Contractors, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Old Republic Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Giron v. CMG Communications,LLC et al
as 8:2018cv02255
Defendant:
Maria Del Pilar Acosta, Carlos Guardia, CMG COMMUNICATIONS LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Javier Giron
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jeffrey Grimes v. Joseph McFadden
as 16-6155
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY NIKO GRIMES
Respondent - Appellee:
JOSEPH MCFADDEN, Warden
Grimes v. McFadden
as 0:2015cv02131
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Niko Grimes
Respondent:
Joseph McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
