Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DeFour v. Unit Manager Shelton, et al
as 7:2020cv00325
Defendant:
R. Whitt, John Doe, D. Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy P. Defour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Defour v. Officer Jones et al
as 1:2019cv01355
Defendant:
R. Whitt, John Doe, D. Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy P. Defour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonah Sovereign v. R. Saylor
as 19-6855
Defendant:
C/O A. CRAFT, J. CRABTREE, J. J. SHORT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONAH JERVAIS SOVEREIGN, a/k/a Jarvis L. Canslor
Defendant / Appellee:
R. SAYLOR
Jonah Sovereign v. R. Saylor
as 17-7004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONAH JERVAIS SOVEREIGN, a/k/a Jarvis L. Canslor
Defendant - Appellee:
R. SAYLOR
Defendant:
LESLIE FLEMING, J. J. SHORT, J. CRABTREE and others
Jonah Sovereign v. Leslie Fleming
as 17-6024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONAH JERVAIS SOVEREIGN, a/k/a Jarvis L. Canslor
Defendant - Appellee:
LESLIE FLEMING, J. J. SHORT, R. SAYLOR and others
Sovereign v. Fleming et al
as 2:2015cv00455
Plaintiff:
Jonah Jervais Sovereign
Defendant:
Leslie Fleming, J.J. Short, R. Saylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Crawley v. Dr. E. McDuffie
as 15-7038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID EDWARD CRAWLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
E. MCDUFFIE, M. WRIGHT, (QMHP), K. D. JONES and others
Saylor v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04316
Plaintiff:
Alma R. Saylor
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Mueller et al
as 7:2010cv00431
Defendant:
Patricia Adams, Tony Adams, Bellamy and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Johnson v. John Jabe
as 10-6847
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN JOHNSON, a/k/a Olando Lee Trent
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN JABE, Deputy Director, Virginia Department of Corrections (VDOC), GENE JOHNSON, Director, VDOC, GARY CLORE, Gang Unit Director, VDOC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
