Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hill v. Government for the State of West Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Eric Rodney Hill
Defendant:
Government for the State of West Virginia, F.C.I. Hazelton and Warden Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Government for the State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Eric Rodney Hill
Defendant:
Government for the State of West Virginia and F.C.I. Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rodney Hill v. US et al
as 10-6300
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODNEY HILL
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, D. BLAKNEY, (Ms.) Supervisor of Education, J. BOLYARD, (Mr.) Associate Warden and others
Rodney Hill v. US et al
as 09-7630
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODNEY HILL
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, D. BLAKNEY, (Ms.) Supervisor of Education, J. BOLYARD, (Mr.) Associate Warden and others
Hill v. United States of America
as 5:2009cv00019
Petitioner:
Rodney Hill
Respondent:
United States of America, Ms. D. Blakney, Mr. J. Bolyar and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hill v. Jett et al
as 1:2008cv00215
Petitioner:
Eric Rodney Hill
Respondent:
Brian R. Jett and H. Marberry
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hill v. Jett
as 1:2008cv00504
Petitioner:
Eric Rodney Hill
Respondent:
Brian R. Jett
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hill v. Jett et al
as 1:2007cv03232
Petitioner:
Eric Rodney Hill
Respondent:
Brian R. Jett and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02110
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
