Cases 1 - 10 of 3,551
Rogers v. Bullard
as 5:2024hc02106
Petitioner:
Antwarn Lee Rogers
Respondent:
Jamie Bullard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. v. Rogers
as 2:2024cv03319
Plaintiff:
Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Travis Rogers
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Kenneth H. Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Day v. Rich et al
as 5:2024ct03135
Plaintiff:
Roger Charles Day, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Rich, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Shore United Bank, N.A. v. Tough et al
as 3:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Shore United Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
David G Tough, Neville B Tough, Pamela J. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Blair v. Harris Teeter et al
as 3:2024cv03126
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Blair
Defendant:
Harris Teeter, North Carolina Industrial Commission, Ace American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Seabrooks v. Richland County et al
as 2:2024cv02905
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Seabrooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Richland County, Crayman Harvey, Kevin McCollough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
