Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Anderson v. Commonwealth of Virginia, et al,
as 7:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Anderson
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Washington County Sheriff's Office, Detective Roop Brad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bermeo v. Andis et al
as 1:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Dyanie Bermeo
Defendant:
Blake Andis, Scott Snapp, Jamie Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samantha Roop v. Nicholas Desousa
as 23-1376
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMANTHA ROOP
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS JAMES DESOUSA
Bermeo v. Andis et al
as 3:2022cv00505
Plaintiff:
Dyanie Bermeo
Defendant:
Blake Andis, Scott Snapp, Jamie Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roop v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
JoEvelyn Roop
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSDC)
Anderson v. Roop et al
as 7:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Anderson
Defendant:
Detective Brad Roop, Detective James Blevins, Lt. Karen Tolbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roop v. Desousa
as 3:2021cv00675
Plaintiff:
Samantha Roop
Defendant:
Nicholas James Desousa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edward McReady v. Montgomery Community College
as 21-1876
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD C. MCREADY
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, DR. DERIONNE P. POLLARD, DR. SANJAY RAI and others
David Anderson v. B. Roop
as 21-6866
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF FRED NEWMAN, DET. B. L. ROOP, DET. LT. JAMES BLEVINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE ANDERSON
Nathaniel Dunmore v. Officer Roop
as 20-7794
Defendant / Appellee:
FANNIN, Investigator, DUNCAN, Unit Manager, OFFICER ROOP, K-9 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL BRUCE DUNMORE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
