Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Weaver et al v. 3M Company et al
as 5:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
William Weaver and Judy Weaver
Defendant:
3M Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WALLS et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00098
Plaintiff:
Laura M. Walls and Robie W. Walls
Defendant:
Strick Trailers LLC, Paccar Inc., METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RATCLIFF v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00174
Defendant:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC, CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., L'OREAL USA CREATIVE INC. As Subrogee Of THE MAYBELLINE CO. As Subrogee Of MAYBELLINE INC. doing business as MAYBELLINE formerly known as MAYBELLINE COSMETICS CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
RATCLIFF and JODY E. RATCLIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dugger et al v. McCormick et al
as 1:2016cv03912
Plaintiff:
Dugger, John Dugger, Jr., Melody Natishin and others
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Hampshire Industries, Inc., The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and others
Cross Defendant:
Eaton Hydraulics, Inc., Jenkins Valves, Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
The William Powell Company
3Rd Party Defendant:
Manville Trust Personal Injury Settlement Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Cox, Sr. v. AGCO Corporation, et al.
as 4:2016cv00084
Defendant:
AGCO Corporation, Star Machine & Tool, SPX Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Cox, Sr, Jack Howard Cox, Sr., Valerie M. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
