Cases 1 - 10 of 108
FREEMAN et al v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY FREEMAN and C. B.
Defendant:
MARBELY SANCHEZ, GREGORY J. SEABOLT and CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lopez-Sanchez v. Ramirez Bautista
as 7:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Melchor Lopez-Sanchez
Defendant:
Fortino Ramirez Bautista
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY $40,500.00 IN U.S.
as 1:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRENCY $40,500.00 IN U.S.
Claimant:
INGRID JIMENEZ SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture - Gambling, etc.
Sanchez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
Santiago Sanchez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Citibank, N.A. v. RGL Freight Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Citibank, N.A.
Defendant:
RGL Freight Inc. and Gretchen Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Glover et al v. RDU Airport Authority et al
as 5:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
Theressa Glover and Guillermo Maldonado-Sanchez
Defendant:
RDU Airport Authority, David Witherspoon, Chris Slavik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
