Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Murphy v. Dotson et al
as 2:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Joshua T. Murphy
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Kevin Punturi, Jermiah Fitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Murphy
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Stephen Herto v. John Murphy
as 19-7752
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN T. MURPHY, Acting Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN D. HERTO
John Walters v. Michael Martin
as 19-7391
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL MARTIN, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center
Respondent:
JOHN T. MURPHY
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN WALTERS
Brownlee v. Murphy et al
as 1:2019cv00026
Defendant:
G. Miller, Bryce, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan A. Brownlee, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 1.17 Acres, More or Less, in Cumberland County, North Carolina, located on Parcel Identification No. 0593-92-5939 et al
as 5:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
1.17 Acres, More or Less, in Cumberland County, North Carolina, located on Parcel Identification No. 0593-92-5939, Edward L. Murphy, Barbara M. Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Taylor v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00173
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Taylor
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Doctor Paul, Loita Butcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sayre v. Murphy et al
as 1:2017cv00198
Plaintiff:
Kenny Drew Sayre
Defendant:
John T. Murphy, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braynen v. Murphy
as 5:2017cv00151
Petitioner:
Leonard Braynen, Jr.
Respondent:
John T. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walters v. Murphy
as 5:2017cv00096
Petitioner:
John Walters
Respondent:
John T. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
