Cases 1 - 10 of 3,454
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Pierce v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv03574
Plaintiff:
Thomas Giniski Pierce
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vines v. Commonwealth Of Virginia Department Of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Clayton Vines
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Virginia Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reaves v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Reaves
Defendant:
Virginia Department Of Corrections and David Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Marable, Jr. v. Mecklenburg Circuit Court
as 24-6591
Petitioner:
WILLIAM I. MARABLE, JR.
Respondent:
MECKLENBURG CIRCUIT COURT and VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Reid v. Employees of the Virginia Department of Corrections
as 7:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Frank E. Reid
Defendant:
Employees of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derek Sprouse v. Virginia Director of Prisons
as 24-6583
Petitioner:
DEREK SPROUSE
Respondent:
VIRGINIA DIRECTOR OF PRISONS, Department of Corrections
Corey Johnson v. A. Walker
as 24-6584
Plaintiff:
COREY E. JOHNSON
Defendant:
A. WALKER, MR. BELL, R. LANGFORD and others
Michael Berry v. VDOC
as 24-6390
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALLEN BERRY
Respondent:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD
Cutshaw v. Sterlin ET AL et al
as 0:2024cv01947
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wayne Cutshaw
Defendant:
Brian Sterlin ET AL, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Lt Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
