Cases 1 - 10 of 41
FRAZIER v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LOUIS FRAZIER and LuLuBell Michelle Frazier
Defendant:
TERRI CATLETT, OFFICER MARTIN, SGT HERNANDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon Prevette v. Lisa Gaither
as 24-6287
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MATTHEW PREVETTE
Defendant:
LISA GAITHER, LASHONNE HARRIS, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, DIVISION OF ADULT CORRECTION AND JUVENILE JUSTICE and others
Ardie Nolon, III v. Todd Ishee
as 23-7301
Plaintiff:
ARDIE D. NOLON, III, a/k/a Ardie Defronso Nolon
Defendant:
TODD E. ISHEE, RODERICK WATSON and TIMOTHY JONES
HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ v. JONES
as 1:2023cv00659
Petitioner:
ESTEBAN HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
TIMOTHY JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez-Gonzalez v. Jones
as 3:2023cv00366
Petitioner:
Esteban Hernandez-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Timothy Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Wright v. Jacintia Bizzell
as 23-6336
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
JACINTIA BIZZELL and TIMOTHY JONES
US v. Andrew Jones
as 22-4710
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW TIMOTHY JONES
Hernandez-Gonzalez v. Jones
as 5:2022hc02192
Petitioner:
Esteban Hernandez-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Timothy Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
US v. Andrew Jones
as 22-7174
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW TIMOTHY JONES
Bradley D. McMartin et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv01143
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., Amerex Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley D McMartin, Walter Maddocks, Rodney Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
