Cases 1 - 10 of 14
US v. Troy Newsome, Jr.
as 24-6519
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TROY LEE NEWSOME, JR.
US v. Troy Pore
as 21-4096
Defendant / Appellant:
TROY LEE PORE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Henry v. Saul
as 1:2020cv03009
Plaintiff:
Troy Lee Henry
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kilgore v. Cohn et al
as 5:2019cv02786
Petitioner:
Troy Lee Kilgore
Respondent:
Lavern Cohn and South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crum & Forster Speciality Insurance Company et al v. Mikell
as 3:2019cv02222
Defendant:
Troy Lee Mikell
Plaintiff:
Seneca Speciality Insurance Company and Crum & Forster Speciality Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 466.19 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Cabell, Jackson, Mason, Putnam, Roane and Wirt Counties, West Virginia et al
as 2:2018cv00044
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
466.19 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Cabell, Jackson, Mason, Putnam, Roane and Wirt Counties, West Virginia, Mary Lou Harshbarger , Sharon Juanita Davis and others
Consol_defendant:
93.48 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Cabell, Jackson, Putnam and Wirt Counties, West Virginia, Marilyn D. Ramey , Town of Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Troy Robinson v. Warden John Pate
as 16-7089
Petitioner - Appellant:
TROY LEE ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN JOHN PATE
Robinson v. Pate
as 5:2015cv04287
Petitioner:
Troy Lee Robinson
Respondent:
John Pate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pitman et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07515
Plaintiff:
Zelda Pitman and Troy Lee Pitman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Troy Williams, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 13-7309
Petitioner - Appellant:
TROY LEE WILLIAMS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.